This article in the New York Times
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/06/us/politics/06palin.html?partner=permalink&exprod=permalink
has some juicy new numbers on what was spent on maintaining Sarah Palin's appearance during her run as VP.
The thing is, as fun as it is to read this stuff, it would be a lot more enlightening to see a comparable breakdown on what was spent on Obama and McCain during the same period. I have no doubt the totals would pale in comparison, but I want to know by how much. I know I'm not the only one who has expressed this, so I'm surprised that the article made no mention of anything spent on the other two candidates. It's as if they're saying that the other candidates spent nothing, when I'm sure that isn't the case.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/06/us/politics/06palin.html?partner=permalink&exprod=permalink
has some juicy new numbers on what was spent on maintaining Sarah Palin's appearance during her run as VP.
The thing is, as fun as it is to read this stuff, it would be a lot more enlightening to see a comparable breakdown on what was spent on Obama and McCain during the same period. I have no doubt the totals would pale in comparison, but I want to know by how much. I know I'm not the only one who has expressed this, so I'm surprised that the article made no mention of anything spent on the other two candidates. It's as if they're saying that the other candidates spent nothing, when I'm sure that isn't the case.
Comments